Research Article

Comparative Study of Understory Between Exotic Monoculture Plantation (Acacia Sp.) and Adjacent Natural Sal (Shorea Robusta) Forest

Md. Tauhidor Rahaman
D. B. Gurung
Md. Najmus Sayadat Pitol
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejfood.2020.2.6.204

Read Counter
706

Downloads
646

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2020-12-15
Published 2020-12-31

Read counter = 706 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

To achieve forest management goal it is important to maintain biodiversity. This paper compares understory plant species diversity between exotic monoculture plantation (Acacia auriculiformis) and adjacent natural sal (Shorea robusta) forest. A total of 35 sample plots were taken by random sampling from six patches of adjacent natural sal forest and exotic monoculture plantation. Shannon-Wiener diversity index, species richness and evenness were calculated and compared. Result revealed that, a total of 2,218 plants of 42 species were recorded in natural sal (Shorea robusta) forest. Dominant families were Apocynaceae and Verbanaceae, having three species in each family. Shannon-Wiener diversity index was 2.1 and mean species richness was 14.4. On the contrary, 2,827 plants were found from 15 species in exotic monoculture (Acacia auriculiformis) plantation study area. Dominant family was Leguminosae family. Three species were found under Leguminosae family. Shannon-Wiener diversity index was 0.86 and mean species richness was 4.47. Therefore, Shannon diversity index and richness were significantly higher in natural sal forest as compared to exotic monoculture plantation. Species evenness of natural sal forest was 0.8 and 0.6 for monoculture plantation which indicates less equitable distribution of understory vegetation in monoculture than adjacent natural sal forest. With regard to herb species, evenness was significantly lower in monoculture plantation (0.03) as compared to natural sal forest (0.52). There was no equitable distribution for the herb species under monoculture plantation. Jaccard’s similarity index showed that 36% shrub species and 30% of herb species were same in exotic monoculture plantation area and adjacent natural sal forest.

Keywords: Herb, shrub, species diversity, species evenness, species richness.

References

  1. Uddin, M. B. (2013). Monoculture plantation in Bangladesh: Consequence for Biodiversity Conservation and Rurallivelihoods. <http://www.rufford.org/rsg/projects/mohammad_belal_uddin_0>.accessed 21. March 2014.
     Google Scholar
  2. Pancel, L. (1993). Tropical Forestry Handbook, Springel-Verlag, Berlin, Germany 809pp.
     Google Scholar
  3. Harley, M. J. (2002). Rational and method for conserving plantation forest. Forest Ecol Manag 155: 81-95.
     Google Scholar
  4. Asian Development Bank. (1993). Forestry Master Plan: Main plan-93/2012, vol. 1, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of Bangladesh.162pp.
     Google Scholar
  5. Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. M., Guogang, Z. and Islam, K. S. (2010). A review of the present threats to tropical moist deciduous Sal (Shorea robusta) forest ecosystem of central Bangladesh. Tropical Conservation Science vol. 3(1): 90-120.
     Google Scholar
  6. Hossain, M. K. (2005). Conversion of dipterocarp-dominant natural forest to short rotation plantation- unrecoverable threat to the native dipterocarps in Bangladesh, APAFRI, Malaysia.
     Google Scholar
  7. Motiur, M. R. (2006). Management and economics of homestead forest in Bangladesh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan.
     Google Scholar
  8. Rashed, K. B. S. (1995). Participatory forestry as a strategy for reforestation In Bangladesh. Geojournal, 37(1), 39-44.
     Google Scholar
  9. Banglapedia. (2013). Sal forest, National encyclopedia of Bangladesh. <http://www.banglapedia search.com.bd>. Accessed 15 September 2013.
     Google Scholar
  10. Alam, M. K. (1995). Diversity in the Woody Flora of Sal Forests of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J.For.Sci., 24 (1), 41-52.
     Google Scholar
  11. Gain, P. (1998). The last forest of Bangladesh. Society for Environment and Human Development, Dhaka.
     Google Scholar
  12. Bangladesh Forest Department. (2004). Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of Bangladesh.
     Google Scholar
  13. Alam, M., Furukawa, Y., Sarker, S. K. and Ahmed, R. (2008). Sustainability of Sal (Shorea robusta) forest in Bangladesh: past, present and future actions. International Forestry Review, 10(1):29-37.
     Google Scholar
  14. Haque, N. (2007). Depletion of Tropical Forests with Particular Reference to Bangladesh. Our Nature, 8:313-3321.
     Google Scholar
  15. Asian Development Bank. (1992). Appraisal of the Upazila Afforestation and nursery development project in Bangladesh.
     Google Scholar
  16. Kabir, M. E. and Webb, E. L. (2005). Productivity and Suitability analysis of Social forestry woodlot species in Dhaka forest Division, Bangladesh. Forest Ecology and Management. 212(1/3): 243-252.
     Google Scholar
  17. GoB. (2001). National report on implementation on UN conservation on deforestation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
     Google Scholar
  18. Wagner, R. G., Flynn, J. and Slovic, P. (1998). Acceptable practice in Ontario’s forests: deference between the public forestry professionals. New Zealand for 16: 139-154.
     Google Scholar
  19. Hossain, M.K., Hossain,M.,S. and Aryal,U.K.(1998). Initial growth performance of eight provenances of Acacia auriculiformis at Chittagong University Campus, Bangladesh. The Indian For,124(4):256-258.
     Google Scholar
  20. http://en.climate-data.org/location/689859/, accessed on 2nd June 2914.
     Google Scholar
  21. Shannon C.E. and Wiener W. (1963). The mathematical Theory of Communities. University of Illinois press, Urbana,111-117pp.
     Google Scholar
  22. Jaccard, Paul (1912), "The Distribution of the flora in the alpine zone", New Phytologist, 11 (2): 37 50, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x.
     Google Scholar
  23. Bajpai, O., Kumar, A., Mishra, A. K., Sahu, N., Pandey, J., Behera, S. K. and Chaudhary, L. B. (2012). Re congregation of tree species of Katerniaghat wildlife sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental sciences, Vol.2, No.12, P.24-40.
     Google Scholar
  24. Tyynela, T. M. (2001). Species Diversity in Eucaliptus camaldulensis woodlots and woodland in northeastern Zimbabwe. New forest 22:239-257.
     Google Scholar
  25. Alem, S. (2006). Regeneration of Indigenous Woody Plants, Status of Soil Fertility and Quality of Coffee found in an Eucaliptus grandis Plantaion and the Adjacent Natural forest in SouthWestern Ethopia. <http://www.researchgate.net/publication/242216773>.accessed 8 October 2013.
     Google Scholar
  26. Pourbabaei, H., Asgari, F., Reif, A. and Abedi, R. (2012). Effect of plantations on plant species diversity in the Darabkola, Mazandaran Province, Nort of Iran. BIODIVERSITAS, 13: 72-78.
     Google Scholar
  27. Yirdaw, E. (2002). Restoration of the native woody - species diversity, using plantation species as foster trees, in the degraded highlands of Ethiopia. Unpublished master's thesis for master's degree. University on Helsinki, Finland.
     Google Scholar
  28. Taleshi, S. A. A. R. (2013). A comparative study on plant diversity in alder (Alnus subcordata) stands of natural and plantation areas. BIODIVERSITAS, 15(1):39-47.
     Google Scholar
  29. Sobuj, N. A. and Rahman, M. (2011). Comparison of Plant Diversity of Natural Forest and Plantations of Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary of Bangladesh. Journal of Forest Science,27(3): 127-134.
     Google Scholar
  30. Mandal, R. A., Yadav, B. K. V., Yadav, K. K., Dutta, I. C. and Haque, S. M. (2013). Biodiversity comparison of natural Shorea robusta mixed forest with Eucalyptus camaldulensis Plantation in Nepal. Scholars Academic Journal of Bio Sciences; 1(5): 144- 149.
     Google Scholar
  31. Chauhan, D. S., Singh, B., Chauhan, S., Dhanai, C. S. and Todaria, N. P. (2010). Regenaration and Plant Diversity of Natural and Planted Sal (Shorea rubasta.Gaertn.F.) Forest in the Terai-Bhabhar of Sohagibarwa Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Journal of American Science; 6(3).
     Google Scholar
  32. Montagnini, F. (1995). Mixed and pure forest plantations in the humid neotropics: A comparison of early groeth, past damage and establishment coasts. For Rev 74: 306-314.
     Google Scholar
  33. Baktash, L. (2003). Effect of plantation on plant diversity in the east of Guilan province, north of Iran. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Guilan University, Somehsara. Iran.
     Google Scholar
  34. Kamo, K., Vacharangkura, T., Tiyanon, S., Viriyabuncha, C., Nimpila, S. and Doangsrisen, B. (2001). Plant species Diversity in Tropical planted forests and implication for restoration of Forest Ecosystems in Sakaerat, Northeastern Thailand. JARQ, 36(2), 111-118.
     Google Scholar
  35. Leopold, A. C. and Salazar, J. (2008). Understory Species Richness during Restoration of Wet Tropical Forest in Costa Rica. ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION 26:1.
     Google Scholar
  36. Huttel, C. and Loumeto, J. L. (2001). Effect of Exotic Tree Plantations and Site Management on Plant Diversity. In Effect of Exotic Tree Plantation on Plant Diversity and Biological soil Fertility in the Congo Savanna: With Special Reference to Eucalyptus, eds. F. B. Reversat, 1st edn., page:9, CIFOR.Indonesia.
     Google Scholar
  37. Brockerhoff, E. G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J and Quine, C. P. (2008). Plantation forest and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Cconserv, 17: 925-951.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)